Friday, February 10, 2012

chennai secular teen stabs hindu teacher to death

feb 9th, 2012 CE

the spin is that he was 'driven to kill'. the old spin that he was 'a laborer's son' has been dropped.

but the reality is that he is a 'minority', so he can kill 'communal hindus' with impunity (especially if, like jews in germany, they are tambrahms in DMK-land)

rajeev srinivasan
'driven to kill' is standard sob story. Poor oppressed palestinians dtk Jews. But poor oppressed Tibetans must not be dtk hans?

 
rajeev srinivasan
@
. laborers son doesn't have license to kill, anyway. Adult crime (concealed weapon, premeditated) means age irrelevant
rajeev srinivasan
Juvenile should be tried as an adult for premeditated first degree murder. Prosecution should ask for maximum penalty.
rajeev srinivasan
Kashmir's Muslims were 'driven to kill' because Hindus wouldn't flee, leaving their women behind. What to do, they are like that only
rajeev srinivasan
Charly aka govinchami was 'driven to kill' sowmya after pushing her off train. Because she refused to let him rape her.
rajeev srinivasan
Looks like it is necessary to frisk all secular schoolboys for hidden weapons just in case. India's Columbine moment.
rajeev srinivasan
If vadra does a benazir Toyota sunroof to Bianca, will he be considered 'driven to kill'? Was walmiki 'driven to kill' Aruna shanbag?

No comments: