Sunday, March 27, 2011

rvaidya: Buffett should learn our ethos of giving

mar 27th, 2011 CE

india has had white people showing up and preaching before. most of what they preach is meant to enrich themselves.

those who know the history of the independence movement may find it intriguing to compare warren buffett's visit to the simon commission's. perhaps the same mantra would be appropriate: "warren buffett, go back!"

i read an article in the obama paper which said buffett spend most of his time pushing his latest insurance entity in india :0

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vaidyanathan R


http://expressbuzz.com/opinion/op-ed/buffett-should-learn-our-ethos-of-giving/258790.html

 

Buffett should learn our ethos of giving

Indian Express / R Vaidyanathan / Wednesday, March 23, 2011

 

R Vaidyanathan

First Published : 22 Mar 2011 11:09:00 PM IST

Last Updated : 23 Mar 2011 01:29:02 AM IST

 

The rootless wonders are agog with ecstasy that Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are visiting India. They will not only explore about investing in India but also urge the Indian business to allocate at least half of their wealth to charity and this year is called year of ‘giving’.

It is important that both of them are educated about our system and ethos of giving which exist from ancient times and do not need lectures through business channels which live and even die for TRPs.

Buffett should know that the greatest hero of all times in India in our puranas is Karna who gave all and his name is interchangeably used for the art of giving in many Indian languages.

Ratan Tata may be shy to point out to Bill Gates that ‘the Tata founders bequeathed most of their individual wealth to many trusts they created for the greater good of India and its people’. So is the case with G D Birla and Jamnalal Bajaj. This may not be trumpeted by Kumara Mangalam Birla and Rahul Bajaj. As a perceptive blogger Sandeep Singh says that as early as 1895 Dayal Singh Majithia bequeathed away three million rupees for noble causes including new ventures by Indians. Actually Majithia was an early ‘venture capitalist’ in India even though not many know about him.

We also find that Swami Vivekananda could not have gone to USA but for local business people funding him and the weightlifters and wrestlers could not have won gold medals at the recent Commonwealth Games but for local traders financing their clubs in remote parts of Orissa and Manipur. Many may not have heard about Ekal Vidyalayas which are one-teacher schools functioning in remote parts of India, particularly in tribal areas. They are in as many as 35,000 villages, educating more than one million children. Take the other example of Satya Sai initiative to bring water to Rayalseema using private donations. The Ninth Plan document of Planning Commission says, “The Sathya Sai Charity has set an unparalleled initiative of implementing on their own without any budgetary support a massive water supply project with an expenditure of `3 billion to benefit 731 villages, etc.”

Later this project was extended to Chennai costing more than `600 crore. Ramakrishna Mission runs around 200 hospitals serving nearly one crore people annually mostly in rural areas. It also runs around 1,200 educational institutions serving more than 3.5 lakh students of which more than 1.25 lakh are in rural areas.

Nadars engaged in business in Tamil Nadu have funded hundreds of educational institutions and hospitals and so the Marwaris/Chettiars/Katchis/Bhoras all over India.

A lot of our education, healthcare, arts, literature and spirituality efforts/ventures have been fully financed by businessmen who are even shy to talk about it. Herein is the secret to the fundamental ethos of giving in India. It is done without advertisements and trumpets. 


... deleted

2 comments:

Sactown Bobby said...

Understand what the author is saying but from the interviews I have seen of Buffet, I know he doesn't support relief from estate taxes.

souixsie said...

I am reminded of Aroup Chatterjee's book Mother Teresa: The Final Verdict, where he lists the enormous amounts of charity undertaken unsung by Hindu organizations in contrast to Mother Teresa's parasitic photo-ops, which provided no assistance to disaster victims whatsoever but got her a lot of press publicity. While Chatterjee is a Bengali chauvinist rather than a Hindu nationalist, the book is a brilliant expose of the hollowness of Christian "charity" as personified by their most famous modern personality, and obliquely shows how Hindus lose the PR battle in this regard.