radha rajan continues the attack on rajiv malhotra and swami nityananda

mar 25th, 2010

while making it clear that i do not agree with radha's (or sandhya's) perspective on this matter, which amounts to ad hominem attacks on rajiv malhotra, swami nityananda, and most perniciously, on swami dayananda sarasvati, i nevertheless put this out there for discussion.

i believe radha's and sandhya's arguments do not stand up to scrutiny: i believe that as the godmen of the church do, hindus need to close ranks behind anybody who does anything dubious, and then do any disciplining in house, rather than wash dirty laundy in public.

therefore i am only providing an excerpt from radha's arguments. if you need more, kindly go find the article yourself.

i wish all this energy were spent on countering the godmens' pernicius influence, especially in DMK (aka christist) run tamil nadu.

the attacks on various swamis is intended to help the padres meet their conversion targets: the wave of conversion based on the velankanni cult has been stopped in its tracks by the rising wave of ayyappa pilgrims, and by the efforts of the kanchi acharya, and it appears the efforts of nityananda to reach out to lower caste hindus. naturally, this means the likes of one father gaspar + kanimozhi (karunanidhi's daughter) -- they form a team -- are alarmed; hence the orchestrated attacks.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Radha Rajan <radharajan7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:57 PM
Subject: Vigil Plainspeak
To:

Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha heading the way of Gandhi's INC - 1

 

Siddhis like milestones must fall by the wayside

After his trouncing defeat on the battle-field by Sage Vasistha in a war in which Viswamitra lost his 100 sons, a vastly chastened Viswamitra was forced to acknowledge that his kshatriyatej was no match for Vasistha's brahmatej. Overawed by the powers unleashed upon him by Sage Vasistha's brahmadand and no longer content with being a rishi or even a rajarishi, Viswamitra with the fire of anger and vengeance burning in his heart and mind, resolved to become a brahmarishi like Vasistha so that he too could possess the matchless brahmadand.

Viswamitra, it was clear, had a long, long way to go before he could get his hands on brahmadand. Rajiv Malhotra should read the Srimadvalmikiya Ramayan to know that brahmadand, the physical siddhi could be wielded only by a brahmarishi, a person with brahmatej. The status of brahmarishi was not about siddhis or mind over body but dharma over mind and body, gyan and vigyan. So much for moral-neutral science or siddhi!

Every Hindu thoughtlessly propagating Rajiv Malhotra's defence of Nityananda must read Sarga 22, 27 and 55-65 from the Balakandam of Srimadvalmikiya Ramayan (Gita press, Gorakhpur edition) to understand why Malhotra's treatise on how the world should view Nityanada's sex videos, is both immoral and subversive.

... deleted