Wednesday, February 24, 2010

so even the atlanticist is gingerly admitting there is no *one* text given by yhwh?

feb 24th, 2010

well, that's pretty serious. it supports what we have been saying all along (esp bart ehrmann) -- the bible is not of divine origin, it's a very human invention. 

which christists stole from the essenes (the creators of the dead sea scrolls about 200 years before the alleged jesus was allegedly born from an alleged virgin... or whatever great stories that have been sold).


so, how infallible can the bible be then? it ain't god's word. so it must be the word of The Other Guy. 


1 comment:

Shankara said...

You know what this does not mean they will accept Hindu faith as more superior, original and the one to be followed. They will now manufacture some theory to draw parity or even claim even a more ancient root to the fake christian faith stating that even though the bible is not divine but the roots of it is more ancient. So lets be careful here. Their ignorance was our advantage. It gave us a lot to laugh about them.

http://sowingseedsofthought.blogspot.com/