Saturday, February 16, 2008

Bollywood dhimmis romanticising historical record of Mohammedan demographic warfare

As if the perverted negationism perfected into a fine art by "eminent historians" of the JNU pseudo-liberal school were not enough, Bollywood dhimmis are trying their hand at celebrating the Mughal butcher Akbar, the poster boy for India's perverted Nehruvian Stalinist "secularism". To these sick dhimmis, a Rajput woman forced under duress to convert to the binary death cult from Arabia and serve as a concubine in the Mohammedan baby producing factory is the most exalted example of "secularism", the illegitimate Mohammedan progeny born out of such forced relationships the greatest living examples of "Composite Culture"(Or "Ganga-Jamuni Tahzeeb" in Hindi heartland Kaangress dhimmi speak)

If a butcher like Akbar is praised to the skies, no doubt the "secularist" intent is that the lives of Hindu women forced to serve as "comfort girls" for Mohammedan invaders, gets emulated in the present day. These JNU & Bollywood dhimmis are collaborators in the Mohammedan demographic aggression on Hindu soil. It is no coincidence, therefore that many of these "eminent" dhimmis happen to be of "composite" parentage themselves. By the way, see how the idiot Yankee dhimmis quickly digest JNU lunatic propaganda. They're very receptive to such crap, although adamant when it comes to presenting Hindus in a fair light in their history text books; CAPEEM's struggle is a case in point.

Hindus will naturally find glorification of their Mohammedan oppressors offensive. The psecs find any resistance coming from Hindus unbearable! Here's some Bollywood dhimmi moron indulging in typical dhimmispeak and I quote:
“We have taken every precaution. A tremendous amount of research has gone into the movie,” Siddharth Roy Kapoor, executive vice president (Marketing and Distribution) of UTV Motion Pictures, told PTI.

He said “certain elements” were trying to create problems to force filmmakers to stay away from certain topics ."

Of course, you moron! These "elements" see no value in your crappy movie or it's vulgar celebration of Mohammedan genocide.
For a small glimpse of the psec poster boy's babarism, I shall quote from Sitaram Goel's book THE STORY OF ISLAMIC IMPERIALISM IN INDIA.

"Humayun had hardly any time free from troubles to devote to the service of Islam. But his son, Akbar, made quite a good start as a ghãzî. He stabbed the half-dead Himu with his sword after the Second Battle of Panipat. The ritual was then followed by many more brave warriors of Islam led by Bairam Khan who drove their swords in the dead body. In 1568 AD Akbar ordered a general massacre at Chittor after the fort had fallen. Abul Fazl records in his Akbar-Nãma as follows. There were 8,000 fighting Rajputs collected in the fortress, but there were more than 40,000 peasants who took part in watching and serving. From early dawn till midday the bodies of those ill-starred men were consumed by the majesty of the great warrior. Nearly 30,000 men were killed When Sultan Alauddin (Khalji) took the fort after six months and seven days, the peasantry were not put to death as they had not engaged in fighting. But on this occasion they had shown great zeal and activity. Their excuses after the emergence of victory were of no avail, and orders were given for a general massacre. Akbar thus improved on the record of Alauddin Khalji. Watching the war and serving the warriors were re-interpreted as acts of war! To top it all, Akbar travelled post-haste to Ajmer where he offered profuse thanks to Allah and the Prophet, and his (Akbar's) patron saint, Muinuddin Chishti, and issued a Fathnãma in which many appropriate verses of the Quran were cited in order to prove that he had followed faithfully in the footsteps of the Prophet. "

7 comments:

truti said...

Curb your enthusiasm and don't become a cheap replica of Raj Thackeray. Jodhabai remained a Hindu all her life. Some of the finest bhakti verses were sung then. Watch Baiju Bavra someday. And listen to that sublime Malkauns/Hindolam composition Man tadpat hari darshan ko aaj written by Shakeel Badayuni, compsed by Naushad, and sung by Mohammad Rafi.

Criticism is alright, as long as it does not turn into hatred and disgust.

Soniya said...

Please check out my blog post on this topic: http://pranidhan.blogspot.com/

siva said...

truti,

It’s a fine line between criticism and hatred; more over it is in the eye of the beholder.

I am leaving all the controversy aside and I believe what you said about Jodhabai. But I just have one question, did Akbar and Jodhabai had children and if so what religion were they brought up in?

If they were brought up as Hindus then your point is valid. On the contrary if they were Muslims then every point karyakarta92 made is valid and you are the one blowing hot air with no substance.

PS: I have a hunch that children of Akbar and Jodhabai were raised as Muslims.

Julian said...

truti needs to do a bit more research before acting like some expert, first off all Akbar never married any Jodhabai at all and this clown tells us that she remained Hindu all her life when infact there was no Jodhabai. He "married" Heera Kunwari daughter of Raja Bharmal of Amber and she promptly was made a Muslim and renamed Mariam-uz-Zamani.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jodhabai

http://www.boycottjodhaaakbar.org/news1.htm

http://www.boycottjodhaaakbar.org/news2.htm

http://www.boycottjodhaaakbar.org/news.htm

Notice that this retard accuses Rajeev of "hatred" but has no refutation of Rajeev's points including Akbars massacre of over 30,000 Hindu civilians in Chittor.

Also he needs to stop learning history from bollywood and get off his ass and do some reading for a change.

What the hell does singing Bhakti verses have anything to do with this, they were not due to Muslim rule but inspite of them, Guru Nanak himself recorded in SGGS about how Babar destroyed Hindustan, by trutis "logic" Guru Nanak composed his Bhakti verses due to Babur's invasion, friggin joker.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Julian said...

In the words of Guru Nanak:

Kẖurāsān kẖasmānā kī­ā hinḏusaṯān darā­i­ā.
Having attacked Khuraasaan, Baabar terrified Hindustan.

Āpai ḏos na ḏė­ī karṯā jam kar mugal cẖaṛā­i­ā.
The Creator Himself does not take the blame, but has sent the Mugal as the messenger of death.

Ėṯī mār pa­ī karlāṇė ṯaiʼn kī ḏaraḏ na ā­i­ā. ||1||
There was so much slaughter that the people screamed. Didn't You feel compassion, Lord? ||1||

Karṯā ṯūʼn sabẖnā kā so­ī.
O Creator Lord, You are the Master of all.

Jė sakṯā sakṯė ka­o mārė ṯā man ros na ho­ī. ||1|| rahā­o.
If some powerful man strikes out against another man, then no one feels any grief in their mind. ||1||Pause||

Sakṯā sīhu mārė pai vagai kẖasmai sā pursā­ī.
But if a powerful tiger attacks a flock of sheep and kills them, then its master must answer for it.

Raṯan vigāṛ vigo­ė kuṯīʼn mu­i­ā sār na kā­ī.
This priceless country has been laid waste and defiled by dogs, and no one pays any attention to the dead.

http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani.gurbani?Action=Page&Param=360&english=t&id=16508#l16508

That's the record of Babur the founding tyrant of the Mughal dynasty and his degenerate offspring continued with that tradition.

Unknown said...

There was no one called jodha. Only some Rajput harem girls.