july 4th, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/us/04identity.html?_r=1&th=&emc=th&pagewanted=all
i am using the sunni warrior tactic. whenever a christist is found to be a criminal or a monster, eg. hitler or stalin, the sunni warrior claims said christist is in fact not a christist. so we can all go home happy. others declare that criminals are not 'true' christists, whatever that means. this is uncannily close to the mohammedan tactic that says that all mohammedan terrorists are not 'true' mohammedans.
using the same tactic, since this shiva brent sharma is found to be a criminal, i declare that he is no hindu. if he were a hindu, he would not be a criminal.
QED.
amazing, isn't it? truth by repeated assertion can work both ways. what's good for the goose is good for the gander too.
1 comment:
Kaalan, what makes you think DarkStorm is not authoritative about Hinduism (er, sorry, Sanatana Dharma)? Since you keep professing that everyone on this blog is not a Hindu, lets see what you know about Sanatana Dharma. Care to explain to us ignorants what it is all about?
Post a Comment